All checks were successful
Build and deploy / Validate source (push) Successful in 1m23s
Build and deploy / Integration suite on a real stack (push) Successful in 3m13s
Build and deploy / Secret scan and release gate (push) Successful in 10s
Build and deploy / Publish images (push) Successful in 1m25s
The price depends on the grade, which the browser worked out and the API took on trust. Before a cart is approved at checkout the API now recomputes it from the uploaded files by the Site's own rules: the pixel size in a PNG, JPG or WebP header across the printed width (rotation included), and the area-weighted DPI of the images placed in a PDF of up to 150 MB, 300 for vectors. Sheets take the worst grade, artworks the average. A claim more than 2 points above the file's grade, or a discount on a file the server cannot grade, waits for an operator, with the reason on the Kanban. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Documents
| File | What it is |
|---|---|
reuniao-2026-09-09-anotacoes.pdf |
Meeting notes that set the business direction: the bottleneck, the 24h goal, the automation and payment decisions. Still the record of what was asked for. |
roadmap-cliente.pdf |
The client-facing plan, as last sent. Generated by tools/generate_dtf_report.py; regenerate rather than edit. |
historico/ |
The original specification and prototype documents. Background only — they describe a model this system does not implement. |
Current engineering documents live at the repository root: CONTEXT.md for how
the system works, ROADMAP.md for what is outstanding, LOCAL_SETUP.md to run
it, PORTAINER.md to deploy it, SECURITY_REPORT.md and PRODUCTION_INPUTS.md
for the security position and the decisions still owed by the client.
Weekly client reports are deliverables, not repository content. They are produced for a specific week and are deliberately not versioned here.