Fix RFV period buyers with historical scoring

backend/test/analyticsService.test.js

@@ -191,28 +191,30 @@ test('buildRfmClients scores segments from RFM history when period totals are sm
     assert.equal(yesterdayBuyer.monetaryScore, 3);
 });
 
-test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected period', async () => {
+test('getRfmAnalytics classifies period buyers by history through the selected range end', async () => {
     const originalQuery = pool.query;
     const calls = [];
 
     pool.query = async (sql, params) => {
         calls.push({ sql, params });
         const isHistoryQuery = sql.includes('recency_days');
-        const endDate = params[0];
+        const referenceDate = params[0];
 
         if (isHistoryQuery) {
             return {
                 rows: [
                     {
+                        customer_key: '1',
                         name: 'Cliente Ontem',
                         phone: '1',
                         monetary: 5000,
                         frequency: 20,
                         quantity_purchased: 20,
                         last_purchase_date: '2026-06-14',
-                        recency_days: endDate === '2026-06-13' ? 0 : 1
+                        recency_days: referenceDate === '2026-06-14' ? 0 : 1
                     },
                     {
+                        customer_key: '2',
                         name: 'Cliente Antigo',
                         phone: '2',
                         monetary: 50,
@@ -222,6 +224,7 @@ test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected
                         recency_days: 164
                     },
                     {
+                        customer_key: '3',
                         name: 'Cliente Medio',
                         phone: '3',
                         monetary: 100,
@@ -229,6 +232,16 @@ test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected
                         quantity_purchased: 2,
                         last_purchase_date: '2026-03-01',
                         recency_days: 105
+                    },
+                    {
+                        customer_key: 'name:Cliente Sem Fone',
+                        name: 'Cliente Sem Fone',
+                        phone: null,
+                        monetary: 1000,
+                        frequency: 10,
+                        quantity_purchased: 10,
+                        last_purchase_date: '2026-06-14',
+                        recency_days: 1
                     }
                 ]
             };
@@ -237,6 +250,7 @@ test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected
         return {
             rows: [
                 {
+                    customer_key: '1',
                     name: 'Cliente Ontem',
                     phone: '1',
                     monetary: 100,
@@ -245,12 +259,22 @@ test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected
                     last_purchase_date: '2026-06-14'
                 },
                 {
+                    customer_key: '4',
                     name: 'Cliente Novo no Periodo',
                     phone: '4',
                     monetary: 25,
                     frequency: 1,
                     quantity_purchased: 1,
                     last_purchase_date: '2026-06-14'
+                },
+                {
+                    customer_key: 'name:Cliente Sem Fone',
+                    name: 'Cliente Sem Fone',
+                    phone: null,
+                    monetary: 30,
+                    frequency: 1,
+                    quantity_purchased: 1,
+                    last_purchase_date: '2026-06-14'
                 }
             ]
         };
@@ -261,18 +285,26 @@ test('getRfmAnalytics groups period buyers by their RFM tag before the selected
         const yesterday = await getRfmAnalytics({ start: '2026-06-14', end: '2026-06-14' });
 
         assert.deepEqual(calls[0].params, ['2026-06-09', '2026-06-15']);
+        assert.doesNotMatch(calls[0].sql, /cliente_fone IS NOT NULL/);
         assert.match(calls[1].sql, /\(\$1::date - MAX\(data_pedido_date\)\)::int/);
         assert.match(calls[1].sql, /data_pedido_date <= \$1::date/);
-        assert.deepEqual(calls[1].params, ['2026-06-08']);
+        assert.doesNotMatch(calls[1].sql, /cliente_fone IS NOT NULL/);
+        assert.deepEqual(calls[1].params, ['2026-06-15']);
         assert.deepEqual(calls[2].params, ['2026-06-14', '2026-06-14']);
-        assert.deepEqual(calls[3].params, ['2026-06-13']);
+        assert.deepEqual(calls[3].params, ['2026-06-14']);
         assert.equal(sevenDays.clients[0].segmentKey, 'champions');
         assert.equal(yesterday.clients[0].segmentKey, 'champions');
         assert.equal(yesterday.clients[0].frequency, 1);
         assert.equal(yesterday.clients[0].monetary, 100);
-        assert.equal(yesterday.clients.length, 2);
+        assert.equal(yesterday.clients.length, 3);
         assert.ok(!yesterday.clients.some(client => client.phone === '2'));
         assert.ok(yesterday.clients.some(client => client.phone === '4' && client.segmentKey === 'new_customers'));
+        assert.ok(yesterday.clients.some(client => (
+            client.customerKey === 'name:Cliente Sem Fone' &&
+            client.phone === '' &&
+            client.segmentKey === 'champions' &&
+            client.monetary === 30
+        )));
     } finally {
         pool.query = originalQuery;
     }