Tiny v3 replaces the v2 token adapter. An operator connects Tiny once from
the Kanban; the callback is authorised by a single-use state, because Tiny's
cross-site redirect does not carry the SameSite=Strict operator cookie.
Tokens are kept in provider_tokens, the refresh token rotates under a row
lock, and the worker keeps the connection alive while order creation is off.
Orders find or create the customer's contact by CNPJ, then POST /pedidos
with product ids from TINY_PRODUCT_TEXTIL_FOLHA, _TEXTIL_AVULSA, _UV_FOLHA
and _UV_AVULSA and numeroOrdemCompra DTF-<number>; a retry searches the
customer's recent orders for that number first. The product settings avoid a
_FILE suffix, which the secrets loader reads as a secret file path.
Production passes the application credentials through but keeps
TINY_ADAPTER fake: Tiny has no sandbox, so creating real orders waits for a
supervised test. compose.providers.yaml gives the local API and worker an
internet route for provider testing; the default local stack still has none.
Verified with the full CI integration sequence locally, including the new
tiny_oauth_test against the real database.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was no inbound payment path at all: a button called a fake synchronously
and wrote an order. A real provider does the opposite — it charges, then tells
us, repeatedly, out of order, and sometimes long afterwards.
POST /api/payments/webhook verifies the signature before the body is parsed, so
an unsigned or tampered delivery is refused and recorded without touching an
order. Verified deliveries are stored under the provider's own event id with a
unique constraint, and applied inside the same transaction that marks them
processed: a repeat is a no-op, a crash is retried rather than half-applied.
An approval whose amount disagrees with the reviewed quote does not become an
order. Underpayment would ship artwork nobody paid for, and overpayment means
something a person should look at.
Order creation moved to app/payments.py so the webhook and the local development
checkout share one implementation and cannot drift. That also closes 3.5: the
charge happens inside the transaction that persists the order, rather than
before it.
The adapter contract is create/verify/parse. FakePayment implements it with a
real HMAC scheme so the whole path is exercised now, by tests/payment_test.py:
unsigned, tampered, underpaid, duplicate, re-sent, unknown reference, and
non-approved statuses. Connecting Mercado Pago is one adapter; no service code
changes.
PAYMENT_WEBHOOK_SECRET is optional in production on purpose. Required would
break the next Portainer render, and a guessable default would be worse than
either: with no secret configured the adapter verifies nothing and therefore
accepts nothing, which is the right state until a provider is connected.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
local/ held six unrelated things under a name that stopped being true once it
became the production runtime: the service, the frontend, the tests, the ops
commands, the container definitions and the dependency lock, 65 files with
nothing to tell them apart.
app/ the service: api/ routers, core/ for identity, database, models,
prices and secret loading, and the worker, bootstrap and schema
tests/ the twelve suites, no longer inside the shipped package
ops/ backup, readiness, dependency audit, security summary
infra/ Dockerfiles, gateway templates, ClamAV and storage configuration,
the requirements and their hash lock
web/ the Site, Kanban and portal pages with their scripts
deploy/Dockerfile.api now copies app/ alone, so the tests stop shipping to
production; the local image still carries them, because the suites run inside
the stack's network.
Five kinds of reference had to follow, and each was found by something different
rather than by reading. Imports of the form "from . import db" survived a rewrite
that only matched "from .db import". Tests kept relative imports of modules that
had left the package. A mock.patch target names its module in a string, where no
import rewriting can see it. The browser test resolves a fixture by path. And the
release gate's markers pointed at local/runtime.py and local/worker.py, which is
the decay its new marker test exists to catch — it caught it.
Verified from docker compose down -v: the stack starts, all six integration
suites, both browser suites and the twenty-nine unit tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One OPERATOR_EMAIL and OPERATOR_PASSWORD served the whole factory, so every card
movement recorded the same name and the movement history could not answer who
did what. Traceability was one of the things the project set out to provide.
Accounts live in dtf_local.operators, authenticated with the same scrypt hashing
as customer accounts and with comparable work whether or not the account exists,
so absence is not observable by timing. Administration is a CLI in the API
container, like the schema migration: list, add, password, disable, enable.
Passwords are read from the terminal rather than an argument so they stay out of
shell history and the process list, and disabling deletes that operator's open
sessions instead of leaving them valid for the rest of the eight-hour window.
Migration is the part that could hurt: an empty table means 503 and a factory
locked out of its Kanban. OPERATOR_EMAIL and OPERATOR_PASSWORD seed the first
account, and only when that email is absent, so a password changed through the
CLI survives a redeploy carrying a stale environment variable. The first attempt
at this silently did nothing, because db-init receives its own small environment
and had neither variable; both compose files now pass them to it.
Verified against a running stack: bootstrap seeds the existing credential, that
credential still logs in unchanged, a second operator authenticates separately,
wrong passwords and unknown accounts are rejected alike, and disabling revokes
an open session immediately.
Roles are left out on purpose. The separation of duties the meeting described
governs rework authorisation, which this system does not implement, so a role
model would have no consumer to serve.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
docker-compose.yml passed POSTGRES_PASSWORD as APP_DB_PASSWORD, so the DML-only
dtf_app role and the owning administrator shared one credential and the
privilege separation bootstrap.py sets up was decorative.
APP_DB_PASSWORD is now its own required variable, and bootstrap refuses to run
when it matches the administrator password, in both the URL and discrete-field
configuration forms.
Deploying this requires APP_DB_PASSWORD to be set in the stack environment
first; db-init rotates the role to it on the same deploy.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
