Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cauê Faleiros
cfcbe545f1 ci: require manual gated releases from main
All checks were successful
Build and deploy / Validate source (push) Successful in 1m28s
Build and deploy / Integration suite on a real stack (push) Successful in 4m3s
Build and deploy / Secret scan and release gate (push) Successful in 11s
Build and deploy / Publish images and notify Portainer (push) Has been skipped
2026-09-23 11:27:18 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
24013458c9 fix: harden week-two ordering, artwork and operations 2026-09-23 10:40:18 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
ccc25a2d5d feat: accept payment notifications, once, from a verified sender
There was no inbound payment path at all: a button called a fake synchronously
and wrote an order. A real provider does the opposite — it charges, then tells
us, repeatedly, out of order, and sometimes long afterwards.

POST /api/payments/webhook verifies the signature before the body is parsed, so
an unsigned or tampered delivery is refused and recorded without touching an
order. Verified deliveries are stored under the provider's own event id with a
unique constraint, and applied inside the same transaction that marks them
processed: a repeat is a no-op, a crash is retried rather than half-applied.

An approval whose amount disagrees with the reviewed quote does not become an
order. Underpayment would ship artwork nobody paid for, and overpayment means
something a person should look at.

Order creation moved to app/payments.py so the webhook and the local development
checkout share one implementation and cannot drift. That also closes 3.5: the
charge happens inside the transaction that persists the order, rather than
before it.

The adapter contract is create/verify/parse. FakePayment implements it with a
real HMAC scheme so the whole path is exercised now, by tests/payment_test.py:
unsigned, tampered, underpaid, duplicate, re-sent, unknown reference, and
non-approved statuses. Connecting Mercado Pago is one adapter; no service code
changes.

PAYMENT_WEBHOOK_SECRET is optional in production on purpose. Required would
break the next Portainer render, and a guessable default would be worse than
either: with no secret configured the adapter verifies nothing and therefore
accepts nothing, which is the right state until a provider is connected.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-22 13:25:08 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
7386469404 docs: move the engineering documents into docs/
All checks were successful
Build and deploy / Validate source (push) Successful in 5s
Build and deploy / Integration suite on a real stack (push) Successful in 1m18s
Build and deploy / Secret scan and release gate (push) Successful in 6s
Build and deploy / Publish images and notify Portainer (push) Successful in 1m26s
Thirteen files at the repository root, seven of them documents. Only README.md
earns a place there; the rest are now in docs/ beside the meeting notes, the
client roadmap and the historical material.

The compose files stay. docker-compose.yml is the path the dtf-cloud Portainer
stack reads, so moving it would break deployment, and Docker resolves a compose
file's relative build contexts against its own directory, so moving the other
two would silently break every build. Both reasons are now written down where
someone would otherwise try it.

Correcting references turned up a live fault: the Portainer stack creation
instructions still named deploy/stack.yaml as the compose path. That file was
removed, so anyone recreating the stack from these instructions would have
failed. It names docker-compose.yml now, with the reason it stays at the root.

ROADMAP.md keeps the paths its closed findings were written with, and says so at
the top. Those entries record where a fault was when it was found; rewriting
them to match a later layout would make the record less true, not more.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 17:52:20 -03:00