Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Cauê Faleiros
c9f8122600 refactor: give the frontend its own directory and split the API into routers
The Site's page sat at the repository root while its scripts lived in
local/static, a split with no reason behind it. They are together in web/ now,
with the page as index.html, which is also what the image serves.

app.py held the adapters, the configuration, the shared query helpers and
nineteen routes; customer.py held fourteen more but could not import from it
without a cycle, so it was wired by passing nine callables into install_routes.
Configuration and shared helpers move to local/runtime.py, the rules for
attaching artwork to an order move to local/artwork.py where a customer
correction and an operator final-file set can share them, and the routes become
seven routers under local/api. app.py is 48 lines that create the application,
apply the middleware and include them. Routers import downwards only.

Three faults came out of the extraction and are worth recording, because each
passed a check that looked sufficient. ast reports a function's line at the def,
so every decorator on the line above fell outside the extracted range: twelve
routes and the security middleware were defined but never registered, and the
files still imported and parsed cleanly. Names the old closure renamed on the
way in, and a Jsonb import, were missing in three modules. A name-resolution
pass over every new module found those; the route count matching the original
exactly, 32, is what confirmed the first.

The release gate's marker for the fake payment adapter pointed at app.py and the
adapter moved to runtime.py, so the gate passed while the condition it guards was
unchanged. That is the same silent decay 2.5 set out to fix. A test now asserts
every marker still matches something in its file, so the next move fails loudly.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 17:22:00 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
4c9fa2436e build: pin base image digests and clear every fixable image finding
The production images built on mutable tags with --pull, so the same commit
could produce different bases, and neither Dockerfile upgraded its OS packages
even though the local ones did. The published API image carried 56 HIGH and 3
CRITICAL findings, 15 of them with an upstream fix available.

Pin both bases by digest and upgrade OS packages in the production images. That
removes all 3 CRITICAL and 13 of the 15 fixable findings. The remaining two,
msgpack and setuptools, come from a third-party SBOM; neither package is
importable or listed by pip in the built image, which I confirmed rather than
taking the previous report's word for it.

The web image could not be fixed this way: the official 1.28 line pins
nginx=1.28.3-r1 in /etc/apk/world, so apk upgrade leaves five HIGH findings in
place even though Alpine ships 1.28.3-r7. Moving to nginx:alpine (1.31.6)
clears them completely; 1.29-alpine scans worse, at 37 HIGH. Same uid 101 and
the same template entrypoint, and the local images now use the same pinned
bases so the integration suite exercises what ships. Full suite passes on
nginx 1.31.6, including the browser end-to-end.

With both images at zero CRITICAL, the image scan now blocks on CRITICAL and
reports HIGH, instead of reporting everything. PYTHON_BASE_IMAGE and
NGINX_BASE_IMAGE are wired through to the builds so a base can move forward
without editing the repository, which is what PORTAINER.md already promised.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-21 11:58:32 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
7605ca9918 fix: start web services in Portainer Swarm
All checks were successful
Build and deploy / Validate source (push) Successful in 7s
Build and deploy / Publish images and notify Portainer (push) Successful in 43s
2026-09-18 12:02:31 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
6c0c94373a ci: publish DTF images and notify Portainer
All checks were successful
Build and deploy / Validate source (push) Successful in 1m29s
Build and deploy / Publish images and notify Portainer (push) Successful in 1m17s
2026-09-17 17:21:21 -03:00
Cauê Faleiros
98c951d374 first commit
Some checks failed
Validate, publish and deploy / validate (push) Successful in 2m2s
Validate, publish and deploy / publish-and-deploy (push) Failing after 8s
2026-09-15 16:42:34 -03:00